Court considering compensating Abigail Maass for being exploited online and being the breadwinner in the family.
Pinched this tea from another site, but verified info as it is in public records. most documents are properly sealed in Abigail’s guardianship but this one wasn’t. By way of context, as customary, during the Guardianship process, Abigail was appointed her own attorney. That Attorney or someone else must have requested the appointment of an independent court monitor (less routine) to investigate her financial circumstances. That appointment is made pursuant to Rule 5.720 - COURT MONITOR, Fla. Prob. R. 5.720 | Casetext Search + CitatorThe court Monitor’s report must have recommended that Abigail get a percentage of the Maass’ social media enterprises that feature her. That document is sealed but Asa and Priscilla’s response is not. They do not want to pay Abbie a % of the income she makes possible for them but pay her an hourly wage - no more than $25 an hour. (no doubt paid in 1 minute increments for work that ends up being broadcast - my take LOL). The only reason stated in response to the court monitor’s report is that she would lose government assistance if she makes over 10.5k a year . This from the couple, especially Priscilla, stating that her child was never going to have to rely on GoVeRnment handouts. even though she has been in receipt of significant tax payer funded assistance probably since diagnosis. These People are such hypocrites and are in my humble opinion stealing from their daughter.