Here is a question.
If you are so bothered by this thread, why feed this thread?
You must have known that you were not really backing your own claims.
This is so detrimental to you proving your case, there is no way you read these and thought,
"Oh yeah I will post this because this proves I...
This is what I am saying.
Some of the papers do prove so of the issue she have complained about.
But...
The major one or what I see is major are missing from the first equation. Official documents of diagnosis not notes, doctors notes.
BPD? ADHD? OCD? The stand outs.
Real people deal with...
These would have been mentioned if an diagnosis was present.
Its her just trying to escape her s.
Some of the stuff genuinely does not look legit at all.
Different fonts, a lot of the note look like they have been tampered with.
Safe to say full on skepticism here.
Jodie, you aren't doing a...
I had a thought about the 'evidence' after examining again some look like they are not real to be honest. Tampered with or forged?
This letters really aren't backing her up at all.
I have been bothered by this.
She is playing ring a round a Roses.
She literally is sitting there saying we aren't reading the papers correctly.
How much more obvious do the court papers need to be?
That is not that at all.
You are selecting what you want to read.
It says you failed to disclose your health issues as well so how would they know, they are not mind readers.
The judge came to the conclusion of inefficient finds of your health.
Acas? This is isn't a lawyer. This is a claim for possible early Consilliation (spelling).
Which is an reach and agreement service with the other party.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.