Any scousers in here that can educate me? If you’re from Birkenhead are you not considered Scouse?
Delusive angie @delusive_angie10
Condoms are classed as birth control, however, I don't recommend swallowing themwtf birth control can men take?
well someone needs to fish out cories diy gastric balloon prontoCondoms are classed as birth control, however, I don't recommend swallowing them
I'm sure I heard about a tablet that men can take for birth control?Condoms are classed as birth control, however, I don't recommend swallowing them
No, you have to cross the river mersey to get to Birkenhead, they get called, plastic scousers, wools or Jedis, ( not by me)they speak slightly different as well.
Wheres the drama? My FYP is full of videos of Paul Breach trying to secure a dutty wine at carnival. 
Thanks for that. I was watching Chester and they were saying Scouse slayer isn’t really Scouse and she hates Chester, Angie and Pearl.
Most physio is done via telephone now (which isn't the same) but some patients do prefer it.I saw my surgeon privately but he said the quickest surgery date would be through NHS but he would be doing the surgery?? I’ve got private physio and just started my NHS physio last week.NHS physio was me going to the health centre,talking to the physio and him emailing me my exercises
Even going private you're not guaranteed to be seen quicker and they are now using the nhs theaters because they people who have waited so long for surgery are so desperate that they have gone private.
Covid has a lot to answer for when it comes to waiting lists and its so sad that people are still living in pain.
I think it was a debate, if you would trust a man to take a form of birth controlI don't think viagra counts
Another day of Angela discussing whether something is SA or.
Lord Judge, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Mr Justice Fulford and Mr Justice Sweeney at a High Court hearing in London, added: "She was deprived of choice relating to the crucial feature on which her original consent to sexual intercourse was based.
"Accordingly her consent was negated.
"Contrary to her wishes, and knowing that she would not have consented, and did not consent to penetration or the continuation of penetration if she had any inkling of his intention, he deliberately ejaculated within her vagina.
"In law, this combination of circumstances falls within the statutory definition of a."
Source: BBC NewsWhat is conditional consent?
Conditional Consent is when consent is given under imposed conditions. If an act falls outside of the given conditions, then the act is non-consensual and goes against the consent given.
The Sexual Offences Act 2003, at Section 74, requires that a person ‘agree by choice, and has the freedom and capacity to make that choice’.
Under UK law consent is specific and is required for each sexual act. In some situations it can be argued that by lying or deceitful action a person can deprive someone of making a full and free choice. For example, by removing a condom without consent or knowledge, the individual deprives the person from making a choice. The person may not have consented to the sexual encounter if they had been aware of the full facts.
In English and Welsh law this is known as ‘conditional consent’ in sexual encounters.
Consent and the Sexual Offences Act 2003
Under section 74 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, if the defendant:
• Intentionally deceived the complainant as to the purpose of the relevant act; or
• Induced the complainant to consent to the relevant act by impersonating someone else who was ‘personally known to the complainant’.
then it is understood that the complainant did not consent to a sexual act and the defendant did not believe the complainant consented. The statutory definition of consent laid down in section 74 was considered in several high-profile cases, including:
• Julian Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority [2011] EWHC 2849 – the defendant removed the condom during intercourse.
• The Queen (on the app of F) v DPP [2013] EWHC 945 (Admin) – the defendant ejaculated inside the complainant’s vagina even though she had told him not to.
• R v Justine McNally [2013] EWCA Crim 1051 – gender deception or gender fraud.
In these cases it was argued that ostensible (apparent) consent was not true consent, either:
• because the accused deceived the complainant in a way that is not covered by section 74; or
• because the accused did not comply with a condition which the complainant imposed when they gave their consent.
The key points from the cases considering ostensible consent are:
• Ostensible consent must be given at a relevant time, normally at penetration.
• A deception (other than one that falls under section 74) or a condition of consent (such as the wearing of a condom) must be present.
• Although deception or a condition forms part of the context of whether consent was given it is not conclusive, other contexts must also be considered.
• A broad and common sense approach must be taken to the complainant’s “choice” and the “freedom” to make any particular choice.
• Section 74 was intended to give individuals personal sexual sovereignty and making consent subject to one or more conditions is an act that embodies that autonomy.
Source: Reeds Solicitors LLPSo yeah, it is legally defined as
. Angela, go back to "Google law school" andSTOP fING DEBATING SUCH SENSITIVE TOPICS, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU ARE fING IGNORANT ON THE TOPIC(S).
Last edited:
Judas has a Penis?!!WE NEED A HEAD COUNT.
APART FROM ME AND JUDAS WHO ELSE HAS A PENIS?
WE NEED A HEAD COUNT.
APART FROM ME AND JUDAS WHO ELSE HAS A PENIS?
Michael, if you're in here can you tell me who Annie is and if Annie's ok... been wondering for years.Maybe ZDB is right and Michael Jackson's not dead, he's been hiding out in here the whole time!
You smooth criminal.
