Aimee said on her dish up dinner yesterday she was on FaceTime to Steph so no doubt they have put this speech together.i think Steph has just made this worse with this statement she has put out, she could have just came on and said I hold my hands up I did interact with this woman,but now she is saying she is going from a legal route which she doesn’t have the money to do and the amount of people who dislike her she going to go for everyone and to make out she is being bullied when everthing points to her but she is just a narc who doesn’t think she is doing anything wrong.Yep! I think Aimee wrote it. It’s exactly what Aimee said when she was apparently involving the police, almost word for word. Do they think we just fell off the ark.
Ahhh makes senseI went on her insta to read the post and got instant Aimee vibes.
I won’t be told otherwise.
I’d love to see Aitkens Rowie on a legal document since they haven’t existed for a number of yearsCan’t wait to see how this plays out, she’s going to need big pockets to fund solicitors, legal fees etc. Especially as so many people dislike her, who’s she going to pick first.
And saying Mrs full Monty, Aurora, gingerbread on CC say mean things doesn’t count. You first need proof, proof that this person has indeed gone out of their way to personally be malicious, ie phone calls, texts. You need it all down in writing, evidence facts. Not I think someone slashed my tyres and pissed in my ice bath.
Aimee wrote it, Vav copied and pastedAimee said on her dish up dinner yesterday she was on FaceTime to Steph so no doubt they have put this speech together.i think Steph has just made this worse with this statement she has put out, she could have just came on and said I hold my hands up I did interact with this woman,but now she is saying she is going from a legal route which she doesn’t have the money to do and the amount of people who dislike her she going to go for everyone and to make out she is being bullied when everthing points to her but she is just a narc who doesn’t think she is doing anything wrong.
Police would look at the TikTok’s taking the piss as bad taste.Aimee said on her dish up dinner yesterday she was on FaceTime to Steph so no doubt they have put this speech together.i think Steph has just made this worse with this statement she has put out, she could have just came on and said I hold my hands up I did interact with this woman,but now she is saying she is going from a legal route which she doesn’t have the money to do and the amount of people who dislike her she going to go for everyone and to make out she is being bullied when everthing points to her but she is just a narc who doesn’t think she is doing anything wrong.
Mrs Rowie, Aitken RowieI’d love to see Aitkens Rowie on a legal document since they haven’t existed for a number of years
My hero remember not all hero’s wear capesPolice would look at the TikTok’s taking the piss as bad taste.
In lengthy discussions with a woman who has abused her children and has a pile of documents from socials services saying so.
Bit more serious.
Emotional abuse cases are seen as serious, not just between couples.
Going to the police would mean a statement from Sarah.
Police to Vav, why would Sarah have any grievance with you, can you take us back to the beginning.
I’ve no idea why I get the hate I get. I don’t know her.
Police to Sarah, can you take us back to the start, what has caused the issues with Mrs Chavron?
Well she was married to a friend, who we all loved and adored. He sadly passed away and we later learnt that £15,000 in charity donations was never handed in. We all felt disgruntled by this as we all donated to the cause as it was funds for a local charity.
As well as…..
Could you imagine these names being used in a court. The judge and lawyers would struggle keeping a straight faceMrs Rowie, Aitken Rowie
Got loved this for a mili second til I realisedMy bad
Didn’t think refrain was in her vocabAimee wrote it, Vav copied and pasted
Hope you feel better babesAfternoon
My fella has been awfy kind and passed me on a gastro bug
Been curled up like a pretzel.
Vavs post - she has nothing and knows she has nothing so if she creates the narrative that she’s been advised legally not to discuss it, this will free her of having to mention it again in the hope it will be forgotten about.
It’s taken her 48 hours to get her strength back, what can happen legally on 1.5 business days? Would take longer to get an appointment.
Ie: stinky’s dad has told her what to write while she sorts herself out.
She wasn’t struggling with the bullying and mental health when she was discussing intimate details of another woman SEVEN months ago. But of course putting ‘a year’ seems like she’s endured suffering for longer.
I really don’t think she understands the emotional suffering she’s added to Sarah by airing those messages of her birth givers clear distain and her VENDETTA against her own child. If I use her own words.
Sarah will have enough evidence to show her birth givers historic abuse and her many attempts at contact, and Vav has shown she’s part of another attempt, I’ll also appearing to show they’ve discussed doing something to Sarah to make her stop (whatever Vav thinks she’s doing). Sarah also said she was sent screen shot. Do believe that’s why her flying monkeys have come out asking questions about proof and receipts to hopefully find out what she’s up against.
Yes last year was wild with silly tiktoks flying about and yes it did get immature. We all enjoyed the show.
But none of that is a clear OK to talk to another woman’s abuser. You don’t get any more despicable.
You hate this woman Vav, you clearly tell this birth giver she bullies your daughter as it’s in her replies. Why would you try help a relationship of someone who bullies your child.
The thing about ‘trolls’ is they keep receipts. You can just pop on tattle and see a screen shot of your darling daughter coming for her choosing to breastfeed. That doesn’t tell me lily is scared or upset. Or you’d need to own up it was you, therefore admitting you’ve put your daughter in danger of repercussions.
Does making piss take TikTok’s give free passage to get in to intimate details with a persons abuser? No.
Does replying to your daughter’s comments give a free passage to get in to a conversation with this person? No.
For a long time you’ve alluded to having dirt one someone. ‘I could expose it all but I’m not like that’. You were revelling in that tiktok.
To then go and expose it all trying to clear your name, and cause emotional damage to someone else.
You also said you’d given a family member a polite request to have someone stop their bullying. Was this that person? You didn’t show that in the reply. Was more said? Was that fabricated? Was it in person??
Your web of lies are catching up.
Vav won’t be welcome many places, and if brands decide to keep someone who gets in bed with an abuser, do them and their company.
BPerfect Brendan is a mental health advocate. If he can see that and justify her actions it says a lot about the brand.
I’ve nothing against the man apart from he chooses to make Vav feel like she’s something.
However this is character defining.
In the DMs?Hope you feel better babes
If I’m right I replied to you on your account with my real account I’m sure on one of them pages
But she’s comparing her “fame” to actual celebs. She‘s a Z list tik tokker not Charli D’AmelioI just seen the music choice. Does she realise that song title can work against her?
Oh and vav is a vag, did yi aye,big beefy Beyoncé and rollandtherat, are bullying me tooCould you imagine these names being used in a court. The judge and lawyers would struggle keeping a straight face
She’s kenga from big brother. Mind her?But she’s comparing her “fame” to actual celebs. She‘s a Z list tik tokker not Charli D’Amelio
Local police visit:Oh and vav is a vag, did yi aye,big beefy Beyoncé and rollandtherat, are bullying me too
(Only ones I could remember off the top of my head)