The thing that gets me is that she thinks people are stupid enough to believe that her kids were removed from her because of a loophole, like it’s just that easy. Social services don’t tend to want to remove children despite what she’s trying to sell the situation as to people.
They will have collected the baby from her in hospital because she will have been deemed unfit whilst pregnant, but they will have put a plan in place for her to follow regarding the baby in order to see if she can have custody back in time - I’m assuming things like being clean, sorting housing, showing change and most importantly, attending visits to see him. He will have been with foster carers in the meantime who have obviously gone on to adopt (foster to adopt situation) because she didn’t do as she was told to be a mother to Alfie. Her ex can’t just stop her seeing her kids unless there’s a court order in place, which there obviously is because she’s said things like “they forgot to put my name on it”. Course they did, Lou, course they did. Barristers, judges and qualified professionals just ‘forgot’ to put your name on a court order. Whoops! Three kids all removed from you and none of it is your fault, absolutely none of it. The social services haven’t got a clue have they, cos look how well you live, they must be mad not allowing children to live or stay in that environment. You and Ste have so much to offer…