BowelBro Richard Davies Bowel Cancer Influencer

Apr 9, 2024
74
117
33
bedfordshire
I dont mean to cause offence, We have had many people come on here saying they know stuff, richard has done this and that, and then never commented again, even tho they still read the thread.....so excuse my reluctance to believe, if you are in the right, and you have a case, there should be no concerns about coming forward.

I understand your doubt but you would need to be legally qualified to appreciate why I cannot be as bold as I’d like. Once I know he’s dead I will be taking legal advice.
 
Feb 6, 2024
297
612
93
Just for the record. Information in the public domain.

Confused...it says richard morgan davies? And whos Mark.....am i missing something🤔
 
Apr 9, 2024
74
117
33
bedfordshire
As I think you know, I’m normally very questioning about new people coming onto the forum, and as @Tired of the BS2 says we’ve been played a number of times. I could be entirely wrong but I’m sensing there may be something in what @truth-hunter2024 is saying. This also has a shelf life of 30th April so one way or the other we’ll know in a few weeks and if the poo is going to hit the fan it’ll start pretty quick after that.

Thank you. Your gut serves you well. For anyone who knows Richard, and his past, they’ll know why I’m being so cautious.
 
Feb 6, 2024
297
612
93
I know that, and so am I. She’s obviously relying on the fact that people don’t know the law to silence them. The defence to defamation is the truth, and if that’s all that people are saying she has nothing on them. If she is threatening people she can and must be reported to the Bar Council and they will take any such complaints very, very seriously. As someone said earlier, there is a phenomenal amount of information available on Google, which she may have tried to have removed, but she cannot erase the truth and unfortunately all this sort of behaviour does is increase people’s suspicions. I’m presuming she was set upon the people on the BB page who made the apologies for questioning why they hadn’t received the book? Their retreat was totally bizarre, but if they were erroneously threatened with some trumped up action it may have worked. Unfortunately for Richard he lived the latter part of his life on social media, choosing to publicise everything he did. If people are questioning something that was in the public arena, aren’t exaggerating, elaborating or lying about their interactions with him or what they say they know, aren’t sharing information that he hadn’t already shared himself in some form and on some platform, aren’t threatening him or his family, then they are entitled to publicly ask questions. If I were his sister I’d be a little more concerned by the threats that both he and Lisa have made, all documented and predominantly based on lies. Yes people on various platforms have been unpleasant, there’s no arguing with that, but that’s very different from sharing information he had freely made available or that directly affected them. I came on here because having followed him after my brother had died, and desperately wanting to see someone young beat this horrible disease, I became uncomfortable by the sudden vitriol he showed against people he accused of “trolling” him. I’d never heard of Tattle and frankly wouldn’t have thought anyone would be out to get someone suffering with cancer. Had he kept it nice I would never have looked at it, but when he started threatening people and offering money for information I became 1. intrigued by what was being said and 2. suspicious of his reactions - I know if someone said something untrue about me I’d be devastated and embarrassed but I wouldn’t feel I needed to come out all guns blazing. Then the flaunting of wealth when we all knew about the fundraiser, and the book sales, left a bit of a nasty taste. if this was just a dying man trying to go out in what he thought was a blaze of glory that’s really sad, and even sadder that people didn’t see this if it was the case and instead just saw a very narcissistic man.
Richard and Lisa publicly doxxed and threatened quite a few people, so the law works both ways, they cannot accuse others of doing it, when they themselves are just as bad....pot kettle black.
 
Feb 6, 2024
297
612
93
Rich Jnr was the sole director, apparently although he was in business with Ben Pickering, and his father was allegedly an unwitting investor. The sister and an ex also get name checked
Were does it say richard ran off with the money, has speculation given us wrong information, or do i rem him apologising for it, but saying he couldnt pay anybody back....🤔
 

Sal

Member
Aug 31, 2023
460
1,168
93
I know that, and so am I. She’s obviously relying on the fact that people don’t know the law to silence them. The defence to defamation is the truth, and if that’s all that people are saying she has nothing on them. If she is threatening people she can and must be reported to the Bar Council and they will take any such complaints very, very seriously. As someone said earlier, there is a phenomenal amount of information available on Google, which she may have tried to have removed, but she cannot erase the truth and unfortunately all this sort of behaviour does is increase people’s suspicions. I’m presuming she was set upon the people on the BB page who made the apologies for questioning why they hadn’t received the book? Their retreat was totally bizarre, but if they were erroneously threatened with some trumped up action it may have worked. Unfortunately for Richard he lived the latter part of his life on social media, choosing to publicise everything he did. If people are questioning something that was in the public arena, aren’t exaggerating, elaborating or lying about their interactions with him or what they say they know, aren’t sharing information that he hadn’t already shared himself in some form and on some platform, aren’t threatening him or his family, then they are entitled to publicly ask questions. If I were his sister I’d be a little more concerned by the threats that both he and Lisa have made, all documented and predominantly based on lies. Yes people on various platforms have been unpleasant, there’s no arguing with that, but that’s very different from sharing information he had freely made available or that directly affected them. I came on here because having followed him after my brother had died, and desperately wanting to see someone young beat this horrible disease, I became uncomfortable by the sudden vitriol he showed against people he accused of “trolling” him. I’d never heard of Tattle and frankly wouldn’t have thought anyone would be out to get someone suffering with cancer. Had he kept it nice I would never have looked at it, but when he started threatening people and offering money for information I became 1. intrigued by what was being said and 2. suspicious of his reactions - I know if someone said something untrue about me I’d be devastated and embarrassed but I wouldn’t feel I needed to come out all guns blazing. Then the flaunting of wealth when we all knew about the fundraiser, and the book sales, left a bit of a nasty taste. if this was just a dying man trying to go out in what he thought was a blaze of glory that’s really sad, and even sadder that people didn’t see this if it was the case and instead just saw a very narcissistic man.
Yes very well put.
 

Sal

Member
Aug 31, 2023
460
1,168
93
If you knew Richard who would know just how much drama and stress his actions created historically. If the police or press are looking into Richard’s history I’m sure they’ll find me.
We have always said we hope someone from the press pick this story up. With regards to the police I just think they don’t have the time or resources to care about a dead man’s actions.

Having said that I greats on me so much that his cherubs really believe he was this wonderful man, an inspiration as his been called many of times. Created an legacy! He does not deserve this kind a of admiration. I believe his dead but I believe he was a con man, not just whilst he was Bowel Bro but I believe there’s is a lot happened prior. I believe he had with help of his sister as much of his past erased from google as possible. I believe Lisa was also involved in all the recent scams/ fraud/ TAX evasion ect

I would love to see the full truth out there for all to see.