Didn’t get the job? You’re our creator, the reason we are here. WE VOTE BIRDIE GETS A PROMOTION!!There’s a few mods on here that do remove stuff.
I did apply but I don’t think I got the job
Didn’t get the job? You’re our creator, the reason we are here. WE VOTE BIRDIE GETS A PROMOTION!!There’s a few mods on here that do remove stuff.
I did apply but I don’t think I got the job
They’ve closed the case? Damn!Tam doesn't know s, even if the officer closed our case on her, that will forever be logged on their system and she will have her own profile with the police for future reports maybe Tam don't be such a wrongen and maybe you could actually do s with your "degree"
I’m not sure actually, especially with the invention of AI. Has that changed the law if the body is fake (AI) and does it need to be an actress that’s edited for it to be illegal. I did wonder that alsoQuestion I have, is were they in fact correct? Is it illegal to edit someone’s face onto a sexual image? Being careful with wording incase someone wants to get me banned
Fair pointI'm not even entertaining this Mrs D respectfully people are grassing
Oh do I saw that this morning,I won’t join atm.ive enough going onIt’s some new thing called Favourite. Iv not ventured over there after hearing it was dead
It was an actual human it wasn't a cartoon , I'll not know for sure until @TimothyDarwin clarifies he knows lawI’m not sure actually, especially with the invention of AI. Has that changed the law if the body is fake (AI) and does it need to be an actress that’s edited for it to be illegal. I did wonder that also
The answer is yes if the image hits a criteria to be considered a deep fake. I personally don’t feel that picture could have been considered as a deep fake.Question I have, is were they in fact correct? Is it illegal to edit someone’s face onto a sexual image? Being careful with wording incase someone wants to get me banned
I knowYou made a TikTok
I know it wasn’t a cartoon AI is fascinating to me because it can affect law in many ways, I just don’t know the particularsIt was an actual human it wasn't a cartoon , I'll not know for sure until @TimothyDarwin clarifies he knows law
That’s the term I was thinking of but couldn’t remember - deep fake!The answer is yes if the image hits a criteria to be considered a deep fake. I personally don’t feel that picture could have been considered as a deep fake.
Can we get a lawyer in here? This is importantI’m not sure actually, especially with the invention of AI. Has that changed the law if the body is fake (AI) and does it need to be an actress that’s edited for it to be illegal. I did wonder that also
Yes it’s illegal. Police take it seriouslyQuestion I have, is were they in fact correct? Is it illegal to edit someone’s face onto a sexual image? Being careful with wording incase someone wants to get me banned
Irish who supports Angie is a lawyerCan we get a lawyer in here? This is important
Does it have to be deep fake though? I’m sure this has come up before but when a child’s face was put on an image. That was illegal but I wonder if it still counts for adultsThe answer is yes if the image hits a criteria to be considered a deep fake. I personally don’t feel that picture could have been considered as a deep fake.
The American lawyers really do love AngieIrish who supports Angie is a lawyer