“Sorry Hun this thread isnt about you, as far as I'm aware nobody asked to hear your life story”
Leigh @xx_jiggly_jugs_xx
What an incredibly unlikeable person she is. She knows it and that's why she is bitter, making her even more unlikeable. She creates her own vicious circles.
Oi you cheeky t@KKK.Hates.Her.Kids im not a new member baby, ergo your group rules state i can't be KK. I've been here long time
Paul, you are a sad sad little man. You crave the attention of a bunch of housewives, most who's own houses are pig styes.
My house is fing spotless and your fing hock fits in my kitchen. Off you do you nasty prick*hovel…. Speed typing in angerOi you cheeky t
The irony of kk talking about pig stys when she lives in that absolute hovel of a houseOi you cheeky t
seen crack dens with better furniture
Her house is so jank she photoshops herself out of it 
I read that in the accent tooNOT ANOTHER ONEEE?!
Overwhelming support? I have literally never seen anyone as hated as her
Nobody asked to hear your life story….. again, I fing love this page
Think I’m the one who was supposed to be blackmailing her unless she’s moved on to it being Paul now? I’m still yet to see my ransom note or what my demands were though
‘Send me 48 meatballs or I leak the voicenotes’
‘Send me 48 meatballs or I leak the voicenotes’
Think I’m the one who was supposed to be blackmailing her unless she’s moved on to it being Paul now? I’m still yet to see my ransom note or what my demands were though
‘Send me 48 meatballs or I leak the voicenotes’
I heard you'd demanded a bag of weed, out of date mince meat and a live chicken off her
Couldn’t imagine the state of the weed she’d get if she did smoke! ‘I’m not paying that much for cali buds when I can just flash my gash to the 60 year old down the road who grows his own, it just doesn’t make sense!’
I have no ideaThink I’m the one who was supposed to be blackmailing her unless she’s moved on to it being Paul now? I’m still yet to see my ransom note or what my demands were though
‘Send me 48 meatballs or I leak the voicenotes’
I'm assuming there are guidelines on what constitutes 'significant harm'? Is it ultimately down to an individual to assess the 'evidence' and make their own decision?
Yeah I find it odd that Paul is getting the blame, you ever heard of the saying ‘don’t shoot the messenger’?? All the disgusting words came out your own big fat gob, you’re just upset it’s come to bite you on that spotty orange arse.
As for the jawline? You troll yourself you funny t
As for the jawline? You troll yourself you funny t
Physical abuse is literally seen as significant harm on the 4.3 recognition of significant harm chapter of the safeguarding children partnership so I'd say they qualify.
There's no absolute criteria, all forms of abuse could result in a section 47 investigation, physical, emotional, sexual, neglect etc. However it's a judgement call, for eg is there cumulative longstanding abuse, was it premeditated, What's the likely psychological effects on the child if they've witnessed the abuse of others (a child witnessing DV could be at risk of significant harm for eg even if not being hurt physically themselves)I'm assuming there are guidelines on what constitutes 'significant harm'? Is it ultimately down to an individual to assess the 'evidence' and make their own decision?
Obviously if there is evidence of sexual abuse or a child has unexplained broken bones or cigarette burns etc no judgement to be made straight referral to MASH for section 47/ emergency protection order and removal pending investigation
But evidence of one incident that could be explained as accidental? it's not going to meet the threshold. unless of course there is lots of other evidence which forms a clear picture of significant harm or risk of significant harm.
Please stop getting your information off Google.
You're actually being informed by someone who is well educated on the ins and outs.
Ultimately its for children's social care to look at the referral and consider next steps. Anyone and everyone is entitled to make a referral and SHOULD make a referral if they suspect (proof or no proof) that a child may be at risk. So no point going back and fourth on here about what they will and won't investigate. Our responsibility as individuals is only to refer.
I’m struggling to understand (realistically) how it can be passed as ‘accidentally’ when in the same sentence she admitted to giving the child a ‘bollocking’ that to me seems like total lack of self control, not to mention the force of a typically soft toy, used to black a child’s eye.