daddy jones back up in her comments spamming her page 
Stephanie Vavron @stephanievavron
The vocabulary of someone is an absolute give away of someone’s intelligence. Akchilly like…. Yaaaa
100% this. Did she declare a conflict of interest when she reviewed GHD ? I can’t remember.
Nope
If your phone has saved that spelling. It might autocorrect next time you use that word. Could be pretty embarrassing if it’s an important text
Well that also seems a bit underhand. Unethical .maybe even against Tik tok rules .
This is for you , glitter boots . Except we're wearing them ....
Last edited:
This, go and get properly fitted at an independent bra fitter. Spend 300 quid on decent bras and don't put yourself through a general anaesthetic unless absolutley necessary.
Obsessed ?! Steady , yet she's not obsessed phoning people's workplaces or causing trouble for people ?! Karma , what goes around , come's around . GTF
I agree, it's actually scary. They didn't even teach electrolysis when I qualified and that was 6 years ago. And don't even get me started on injectables. Beauty is an underrated job, the amount of anatomy you need is unreal, but knowing what I know, I would only got to one or two people in the Aberdeen area, as I know they are qualified with practitioner qualifications
I would think she‘s been told defamation is hard to prove perhaps because “the Defamation and Malicious Publication (Scotland) Act 2021 sets out statutory defences to defamation, replacing the old common law defences”. Nae luck Vav and btw no higher power is looking out for you. If it was your past behaviour wouldn’t keep pushing back at you nor would your current behaviour. You’re creating all of it by your own thoughts. If you akchilly knew how it works you would know you are attracting all the negative backlash. I love that she thinks she’s mastered the universe and know she’s incapable of removing those thoughts 
The defences to defamation are:
The defences to defamation are:
- That the allegation is true or substantially true.
- The statement was published on a matter of public interest and it was reasonably believed that publishing the statement was of public interest.
- The statement is an expression of honest opinion, based on evidence.
- The statement was published in the context of a fair and accurate report of court proceedings
- Qualified privilege is available in certain limited circumstances, for example, in peer reviewed academic writing.
Last edited:
The amount of people commenting “jealousy” is unreal. I’m about to be a real b here but who is jealous of a chubber with no friends, who can’t look after her children with her mum or nanas support, is hated in the city she lives in, has 2 by 2, was riding a skinny geek, and has no career but rather punts any old nonsense online?!