Alot he says feels made up, full of drama, trying to make out his nurses cried, he texts his dr...
I'm sorry but NO doctor gives out their private number!
I do wonder if his * cherubs* are catching on yet,
When you put all the info together like they have in Wiki on Tattle, it screams con! Somebody needs to sacrifice their Instagram account ( cos he will block them ) and put a post on in the middle of the night for the cherubs to see about the threads on Tattle, the house being for sale, and the Comment Cafe, at least people can get on here to comment, might get some tattlers coming over too.
This man is using his terminal illness claim, ( and if its true, then I'm very sorry, ) to scam money off people, and if it is true, then his behaviour is still disgusting. Being terminally ill does not give you the right to lie and cheat and con people! End of..!
A PICC line can be used to give other treatments including intravenous (IV) nutrition, I wonder if he is on that due to WLS complications?
I’ve re read these letters and they just don’t make sense at all - ‘get his stoma moving again?’ Err that is not something anyone with any real medical training would say.
Would a consultant even use lay terms like flushing and tightness?
Would they say it sounds like a form or reaction? Surely a consultant would make a more definitive diagnosis. They don’t tend to speculate to the point where they sound that unsure.
Appropriate pre meds? Hmm again not the language of a highly qualified oncology consultant at the top of their game.
Ending the letter with I am letting Richard decide what he wants to do. Most consultants have plan for treatment.
A doctor would never say there are ‘about’ 9
metastases. It would be a definitive report on the exact number visualised during imaging.
Can you imagine a radiographer saying yeah this guy has about x amount of tumours?? The also wouldn’t say all small - again exact measurements would be provided and a metric size reference range used.
They wouldn’t say his next option is… it would be the next course of action, the next treatment etc.
Neither would they say ‘next generation sequencing tests’ either. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a technology for determining the sequence of DNA or RNA, a doctor would just list the tests. If a patient is getting tested for let’s say multiple viral illnesses a doctor doesn’t say I will do a polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) because that is merely the method used for testing. A trained medical professional would specify the tests by name and the investigation required.
The letter also says there is a risk of primary tumour perforation? But… Richard already said that had happened? His primary tumour had already perforated through his bowel and spread? If he has bowel cancer spread to his abdomen and liver well his primary tumour HAS already long since perforated and spread!
Also according to this letter he had a bowel obstruction… that would have certainly resulted in full on emergency surgery. He would have been fully cut and opened up, he would NOT have had laparoscopic surgery!!
What is the date of the loop colostomy (stoma) looks like May but no date? Yet in June he was yet to have the stoma.
FOLFIRI bevacizumab on one letter commenced 10th March 23. Earlier April letter claims MDT meeting 20th April to
discuss starting bevacizumab. The chemotherapy dates don’t match what he has posted online and medics wouldn't be getting that wrong.
Also no medical secretary on the planet would be rainbow fonting, using multiple different date formats, forgetting to put spaces after full stops, not know how to bullet point correctly, switch up letter headers whenever they felt like it, include patient’s date of birth only sometimes, have no reference number or CHI number.
While Richard is copied in this is supposed to be a letter between TWO CONSULTANTS, the language and format doesn’t fit.
This guy is a LIAR and these letters are fake!!