Delusive angie @delusive_angie10

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nolan 🎵

Member
Mar 2, 2024
5,724
31,825
113
This is the site my son used for followers and likes……. He says it’s really cheap xxxx
IMG_7778.jpeg
Any idea what the MK numbers mean ? MK5 , MK100 etc?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ferritface

Nolan 🎵

Member
Mar 2, 2024
5,724
31,825
113
Just came across Holly Stanley live showing court paperwork. Going to put the rest of this message behind a blur because of potential content warning.

CONTENT WARNING

DONT CLICK TRIGGER WARNING


So Holly is showing documents relating to crimes. Here is what has been shown.
IMG_2366.jpeg

So it was said that the indecent photograph of a child related to a cartoon/hentai image that was sent to Holly from someone else. I don’t understand how this would work, because a cartoon can’t be age checked, and I feel like Holly is saying this as a get out. Is this true that these type of images can be classified like this in relation to age? I really don’t want to Google anything about it to check for myself, but it doesn’t add up.

Holly is basically claiming they’ve never done anything wrong other than drugs and driving offences, yet they’re on the SO register still.

Also is there any reason to even believe that document is real?
I really doubt you'd be on the register for cartoons
 

No More Guff

Member
Feb 28, 2024
2,296
8,663
113
I'd imagine they do the same for creators.

Tt encourage sellers to address every person who enters a live, make them feel special. To make the product you're selling relevant to a buyers life. They encourage embellishing the truth. Obviously anyone selling something is going to make it super attractive to buyers but when you see tt actually moulding sellers into money making machines it's quite sick.

The only thing tt don't do with sellers is allow any form of gambling, everything sold has to be known, no surprises. Example sellers cannot sell lucky dips as it's high risk and falls under gambling. (UK) So it's surprising gifting is so encouraged by tt.
To be fair though, that's basic marketing and selling techniques. What everyone has to remember is tiktok is a business. If they weren't making money it's pointless for them.
 
Apr 10, 2024
3,904
14,851
113
Nowhere
Just came across Holly Stanley live showing court paperwork. Going to put the rest of this message behind a blur because of potential content warning.

CONTENT WARNING

DONT CLICK TRIGGER WARNING


So Holly is showing documents relating to crimes. Here is what has been shown.
IMG_2366.jpeg

So it was said that the indecent photograph of a child related to a cartoon/hentai image that was sent to Holly from someone else. I don’t understand how this would work, because a cartoon can’t be age checked, and I feel like Holly is saying this as a get out. Is this true that these type of images can be classified like this in relation to age? I really don’t want to Google anything about it to check for myself, but it doesn’t add up.

Holly is basically claiming they’ve never done anything wrong other than drugs and driving offences, yet they’re on the SO register still.

Also is there any reason to even believe that document is real?
Sorry but why tf would 'voyeurism' even be mentioned if she's claiming innocence (idk anything about this so can't say either way, just going by what is written)

(Edit) Am I being dumb?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted member 2984

SweetButSour

Member
Feb 13, 2024
4,658
19,667
113
There does actually seem to be more further down without the MK Jargon though

Untitled.png
Maybe they look more legit ? They are more expensive….. my son just used it to boost an account for his COD modding “services”
Which as a responsible parent I know nothing about, as well as his Brazilian bank account he uses for fifa points and V bucks to sell to Y7’s 😂😂😂😂
 
Feb 29, 2024
1,159
3,660
113
Waffle waffle
Just came across Holly Stanley live showing court paperwork. Going to put the rest of this message behind a blur because of potential content warning.

CONTENT WARNING

DONT CLICK TRIGGER WARNING


So Holly is showing documents relating to crimes. Here is what has been shown.
IMG_2366.jpeg

So it was said that the indecent photograph of a child related to a cartoon/hentai image that was sent to Holly from someone else. I don’t understand how this would work, because a cartoon can’t be age checked, and I feel like Holly is saying this as a get out. Is this true that these type of images can be classified like this in relation to age? I really don’t want to Google anything about it to check for myself, but it doesn’t add up.

Holly is basically claiming they’ve never done anything wrong other than drugs and driving offences, yet they’re on the SO register still.

Also is there any reason to even believe that document is real?
I'm sure you can find documents about that Holly Stanley/Steve loveday on tattle
 
Status
Not open for further replies.