Sticky Vicky from Benidorm springs to mindWtf is she planning to do with a packet of skittles?!
Sticky Vicky from Benidorm springs to mindWtf is she planning to do with a packet of skittles?!
Im jealous 2She definitely shares these haters love me s to make herself feel better. Or maybe i’m really jealous of her having a tiny 2 bedroom house which was last decorated in 1698, her gormless looking face, massive do off body with unsightly saggy baps and mentally delayed family. Yes, she’s got it in one, I really do want it all - the dream!
Yeah single white female on tattle. Said that they’d contacted the kids schools etc with the OF info, possibly pictures as well but can’t quite remember. Stank of being Aileen lolDoes anyone fancy giving a brief background on SWF? Who is that and what does it stand for? I take it it was someone from tattle?
SWF is the definition of OBSESSED with kk. Not just banter and gossip. Full on infatuatedYeah single white female on tattle. Said that they’d contacted the kids schools etc with the OF info, possibly pictures as well but can’t quite remember. Stank of being Aileen lol
The meaty foot kills me.looking like a 60+ year old
Ham hockThe meaty foot kills me.
Sexily hanging out of her, what is that outfit, white santa??? Starting to think she doesn't realise some men will wank over anything.Ham hock
Eeee my god wtf does she think she looks like,that islooking like a 60+ year old
Even if SWF is Aileen who cares? Whoever it is seems to be doing whatever is right for the children. Even more so than kayleigh.
Hi new member, I do the comma break on purpose Because she would 100% know who I am if I spoke freely, but oh well - hi KK, worked it out yet??
I however think you’re KK. So hi, why would I put video evidence of what your child did on a platform for all to see? That’s sick and I’m not like you, I don’t do f€$¥_¥ up stuff like you you pervert, I mean filming yourself in a child’s soft play for OF is gross, you sick individual. I hope you can afford legal advice, and I am happy to show my face in court should the need arise because what you allowed your children to do in my eyes is a HUGE child protection issue. so why don’t you take your pinch of salt and sprinkle it on your cabbage and shove it up your arse you end.
Nah. Spreading that online is NOT in the children’s best interest.
Let’s say it’s true (I mean, it’s not. Cos that idiot is so clearly SWF but whatever ) let’s say it’s true, how in the do is it in they kids best interest for that to be posted online when we all know stuff said online never really goes away so Bria could read this when she is older? Or the kids at school.
Who in their right mind posts that kind of s? Seriously. If it did happen () and you done your bit and reported it because you care about safeguarding kids, then why they do have you came online to spread it as if it’s some kind of gossip?
I don’t believe. I believe you are SWF and I believe you are truly sick in the fing head to be writing things like that about young children. You my friend, seem like the biggest risk of all.
My issue with what’s been said is that they have implied that Bobby is now displaying signs of sexual deviancy. It’s one thing to talk about Kayleigh’s actions but that is a massive thing to say about a child without proof.So, all since she’s been doing OF pretty much 50% if not more of the comments about her both here and on tattle are saying how her behaviour is a safeguarding issue for her kids. Somebody comes on and says that they have proof that her behaviour is a safeguarding issue, without showing us anything that shouldn’t be seen, not even going into detail about it, just pointing out that they clearly witnessed something that makes them uncomfortable and have reported it…and that’s wrong? Literally proving our points for us and we’re saying they’re wrong for that? This is hella confusing if that’s the case
So, all since she’s been doing OF pretty much 50% if not more of the comments about her both here and on tattle are saying how her behaviour is a safeguarding issue for her kids. Somebody comes on and says that they have proof that her behaviour is a safeguarding issue, without showing us anything that shouldn’t be seen, not even going into detail about it, just pointing out that they clearly witnessed something that makes them uncomfortable and have reported it…and that’s wrong? Literally proving our points for us and we’re saying they’re wrong for that? This is hella confusing if that’s the case
I’ll admit I jumped the gun… Probably cos like a lot of people on here it made me uneasy! But seeing the logic behind it and reading others points of view that person had every right to point it out. It’s not really about the kids as he wouldn’t have the capacity to know what that meant- it’s about her parenting. To be honest what concerns me more is the fact that she’s not stopped doing OF since!So, all since she’s been doing OF pretty much 50% if not more of the comments about her both here and on tattle are saying how her behaviour is a safeguarding issue for her kids. Somebody comes on and says that they have proof that her behaviour is a safeguarding issue, without showing us anything that shouldn’t be seen, not even going into detail about it, just pointing out that they clearly witnessed something that makes them uncomfortable and have reported it…and that’s wrong? Literally proving our points for us and we’re saying they’re wrong for that? This is hella confusing if that’s the case
You think I'm SWF now?Nah. Spreading that online is NOT in the children’s best interest.
Let’s say it’s true (I mean, it’s not. Cos that idiot is so clearly SWF but whatever ) let’s say it’s true, how in the do is it in they kids best interest for that to be posted online when we all know stuff said online never really goes away so Bria could read this when she is older? Or the kids at school.
Who in their right mind posts that kind of s? Seriously. If it did happen () and you done your bit and reported it because you care about safeguarding kids, then why they do have you came online to spread it as if it’s some kind of gossip?
I don’t believe. I believe you are SWF and I believe you are truly sick in the fing head to be writing things like that about young children. You my friend, seem like the biggest risk of all.
So, all since she’s been doing OF pretty much 50% if not more of the comments about her both here and on tattle are saying how her behaviour is a safeguarding issue for her kids. Somebody comes on and says that they have proof that her behaviour is a safeguarding issue, without showing us anything that shouldn’t be seen, not even going into detail about it, just pointing out that they clearly witnessed something that makes them uncomfortable and have reported it…and that’s wrong? Literally proving our points for us and we’re saying they’re wrong for that? This is hella confusing if that’s the case