I reckon they could all be done with fraud tbh....Not to mention morally abhorrent
I reckon they could all be done with fraud tbh....Not to mention morally abhorrent
She’s pathetic, virtually no man wants a girlfriend like you. Fake, unnatural and filtered. No wonder they all run for the hills. Keep telling ya, destined to be a lonely bitter old woman, oh and skintHer latest video
View attachment export_1724007003397.mov
Is she like 12?? My girl does not do that and she’s 13Her latest video
View attachment export_1724007003397.mov
What sexual harassment? Beefy would love something sexual even if harassment was all she was gettingShe’s reported my friends for sexual harassment she’s affected
Are they both underage and does it affect their insurance/liability
I’m not saying FAO would know how much was raised. I’m saying they would know what was donated - this would be a bank transfer as the initial deposit to her bank was BACs. Also it would need to be BACs not cash as I’m sure that could be classed as money laundering. So there would be an audit trail for that, easy.FOA would have no idea of what was raised on their behalf so Steph could have kept what she wanted and donated what she wanted. I think this is why they say speak to Steph.
I can’t stress enough how charities can only take what they’ve been given. She would need to be investigated by the charity commission but even then it’s more a police matter because it’s fraud. But the charity commission and the fraud team investigate it together with financial forensics. It’s nothing to do with the charity sadly.
It would be soooo easy and take financial investigator 5 mins cos shes that thick hahaI’m not saying FAO would know how much was raised. I’m saying they would know what was donated - this would be a bank transfer as the initial deposit to her bank was BACs. Also it would need to be BACs not cash as I’m sure that could be classed as money laundering. So there would be an audit trail for that, easy.
They wouldn’t know with the buckets or cash handed in, especially not when she has open buckets which is illegal and could be dipped (which I’ve heard they were) Not illegal to donate a small % from Indigogo just sey.
If she gave a small % she might get a few looks at how little was handed over but she fulfilled the legal obligation, and if she did there would be an audit trail she could easy clear up. The bio says it’s for FOA, so buckets etc aside, money from there should have been handed over. Charity commission could request that.
Im pretty sure there is a photo of her in a salon holding an open bucket with money in it?
Yeah I’m sure her last claims were Cammy handed it out, then it was businesses never handed money in. She was all over the place.If that’s what Mad Pam is saying then she should be aware people were for donating under false pretences which would then mean misappropriation of funds which is illegal and a crime
I’ve seen it on TL so basically if she had transferred SOME money even £1 to FOA she would have then been off the hook because she transferred SOME of the donations raised that went into HER account and there would also be a receipt.I’m not saying FAO would know how much was raised. I’m saying they would know what was donated - this would be a bank transfer as the initial deposit to her bank was BACs. Also it would need to be BACs not cash as I’m sure that could be classed as money laundering. So there would be an audit trail for that, easy.
They wouldn’t know with the buckets or cash handed in, especially not when she has open buckets which is illegal and could be dipped (which I’ve heard they were) Not illegal to donate a small % from Indigogo just sey.
If she gave a small % she might get a few looks at how little was handed over but she fulfilled the legal obligation, and if she did there would be an audit trail she could easy clear up. The bio says it’s for FOA, so buckets etc aside, money from there should have been handed over. Charity commission could request that.
Im pretty sure there is a photo of her in a salon holding an open bucket with money in it?
……. and Petr’s girlfriend would ideally be - and reportedly IS - a NATURAL stunner!She has treated everyone on her radar like absolute dog muck. Abused, gaslit, taken advantage of and manipulated. The worst is what she did to C and his family but it doesn’t stop there. Colluded with a child abuser, tormented a friend…. It’s a pattern of behaviour that has been enabled but her mother and grandmother. They saw her as a princess and has been treated as such, no one could possibly be better than Ms Robertson and she believes it all the poor cow. Thank god Petr escaped her evil clutches and let’s hope he finds someone who will show him what it’s like to be in a healthy relationship.
I’m pretty sure she’s leant more from here and TL than she has in her whole school lifeIt would be soooo easy and take financial investigator 5 mins cos shes that thick haha
Sadly she could donate £1 as donations coming in never said it was for FOA specifically. Since it was for Cammys recovery which sadly he never got to see through, as his wife she could get to keep it as it’s basically his. But there should have been money given to FOA, which she can prove by showing the bank transfer.I’ve seen it on TL so basically if she had transferred SOME money even £1 to FOA she would have then been off the hook because she transferred SOME of the donations raised that went into HER account and there would also be a receipt.
The fact that there is NO receipt illustrates that NONE of the donations were transferred and therefore she kept everything that was donated.
The lesson she now needs to take from us - is how to spell and also disappear off the face of the planetI’m pretty sure she’s leant more from here and TL than she has in her whole school life
Yeah, would love it if she was put in her place too….she’s such a smug bWhen you get bored….. Aimee’s got a lot to offer as well
Can’t bloody waitShe’s next cos she already has me blocked and I’ve never interacted with her either and this was before I done the vids on big v