Search results

She must put something, but it won’t change the responsibility to refund. People chose to wait when the first publishing date was pushed out, and again they have to be given that option again now. If they are silly enough to wait for a book that is frankly probably never coming (likewise the...

She must put something, but it won’t change the responsibility to refund. People chose to wait when the first publishing date was pushed out, and again they have to be given that option again now. If they are silly enough to wait for a book that is frankly probably never coming (likewise the...

I was looking for something to show the original publication date, and stumbled across this, which I know has been raised before. I was wondering who sam.dsuk was (don’t know if that’s who @Boriswaddle received their response from?) and looked at those who RD has followed (see Instagram...

I was looking for something to show the original publication date, and stumbled across this, which I know has been raised before. I was wondering who sam.dsuk was (don’t know if that’s who @Boriswaddle received their response from?) and looked at those who RD has followed (see Instagram...

“Fraud by false representation is when an individual or business deliberately lies or misrepresents the truth when conducting a transaction in order to make a financial gain for themselves and/or cause a loss to another party.” The bowelbro page now says book coming October 23. With the...

“Fraud by false representation is when an individual or business deliberately lies or misrepresents the truth when conducting a transaction in order to make a financial gain for themselves and/or cause a loss to another party.” The bowelbro page now says book coming October 23. With the...

No No, but the terms of the contract have changed materially (which they did already when people paid for a signed copy anyway, and the person died before it was published) and she must offer people the opportunity of a refund. There can be no more making it awkward for people because they...

No No, but the terms of the contract have changed materially (which they did already when people paid for a signed copy anyway, and the person died before it was published) and she must offer people the opportunity of a refund. There can be no more making it awkward for people because they...

I feel certain he did. He saw what BowelBabe had achieved and thought he could replicate that and direct the money into his own account. If that Twitter account is his it’s exactly what he was planning from the outset.

I feel certain he did. He saw what BowelBabe had achieved and thought he could replicate that and direct the money into his own account. If that Twitter account is his it’s exactly what he was planning from the outset.

That’s very clear! I wish I could get as much detail out of the shot above but that’s about the best I can do!

That’s very clear! I wish I could get as much detail out of the shot above but that’s about the best I can do!

This is that ring, although the one in your screenshot looks more ornate but it could be shadows. Of course she may have taken a photo with another phone, but surely she could have just screenshot the page and sent that to you rather than taking a photo of it? And I’d love to be able to get in...

This is that ring, although the one in your screenshot looks more ornate but it could be shadows. Of course she may have taken a photo with another phone, but surely she could have just screenshot the page and sent that to you rather than taking a photo of it? And I’d love to be able to get in...

I’m possibly being really dim, but is that her holding the phone to show you that she’d sent the money? And if so, who was taking the photo of her holding the phone that was shared with you?

I’m possibly being really dim, but is that her holding the phone to show you that she’d sent the money? And if so, who was taking the photo of her holding the phone that was shared with you?

Sorry, and the PayPal thing - did someone say they’d been blocked from PayPal because of suspicious activity? That would mean that they’d have to use a private account to pay you. Is that what was happening?

Sorry, and the PayPal thing - did someone say they’d been blocked from PayPal because of suspicious activity? That would mean that they’d have to use a private account to pay you. Is that what was happening?

it’s all very strange and unpleasant, but nothing we haven’t heard before. Several people have said they were blocked when they asked for a refund from Richard. Of course we don’t know who’s telling the truth and who’s just wanting to stir, but Lisa’s reaction sounds very similar to what has...

it’s all very strange and unpleasant, but nothing we haven’t heard before. Several people have said they were blocked when they asked for a refund from Richard. Of course we don’t know who’s telling the truth and who’s just wanting to stir, but Lisa’s reaction sounds very similar to what has...