Delusive angie @delusive_angie10

freddieMercurysCat said:

I’m not arsed about most of the dribble on that message but the not working bit has pissed me off. I’ve always been a grafter, i got ill about 2 year ago. I was in intensive care in december for 3 weeks really pooley and i’ve been told since then i can’t work. I’m waiting chemo (i don’t have cancer) i have ILD and the side effect of a certain chemo helps to dampen down my immune system to help prevent any more scarring on my lungs. i’ve gone from running about to breathing out my arsehole just from walking. I would love nothing more than to be able to run about working. I had my own cleaning company which gutted me to give up. So that wanker is just presuming we are lazy bastards. I’m new to CC but i can’t wait to see their evidence or whatever. And i’ll continue to be a dick to other dicks on TT

sorry couldn’t not reply

Click to expand...

SweetButSour said:

Anyone else had a delightful message

Click to expand...

ＤＩＬＬＩＧＡＦ said:

We are discussing @tinkerbellk who has accused @Cockney_Ben of being abusive.

This is not the same Tinks with dark hair, does OF and has association with Alex Brigham, Irish Kelly, Chloe etc.

Click to expand...

• Unplanned and/or limited in scope and duration
• Unsophisticated nature of conduct
• Underlying offence was not serious
• Involved through coercion, intimidation or exploitation or as a result of domestic abuse
• Offender’s responsibility substantially reduced by mental disorder or learning disability

• Limited distress caused to an innocent party
• Limited impact on the administration of justice
• Limited delay caused to the course of justice

Anonymous said:

I'm going on a bit of a legal rant so don't mind me:

To determine the severity of tamperisation with the Law they have different categories,
Now if the individual fell under the least severe crime for tampering which would be Category C:

• Unplanned and/or limited in scope and duration
• Unsophisticated nature of conduct
• Underlying offence was not serious
• Involved through coercion, intimidation or exploitation or as a result of domestic abuse
• Offender’s responsibility substantially reduced by mental disorder or learning disability

And then the harm at Category 3:

• Limited distress caused to an innocent party
• Limited impact on the administration of justice
• Limited delay caused to the course of justice

That would lead to:
Category range
High level community order – 9 months custody

If they fell under section 120 of the coroners and justice act 2009 and section 59(1) of the sentencing code

Click to expand...

Anonymous said:

I'm going on a bit of a legal rant so don't mind me:

To determine the severity of tamperisation with the Law they have different categories,
Now if the individual fell under the least severe crime for tampering which would be Category C:

• Unplanned and/or limited in scope and duration
• Unsophisticated nature of conduct
• Underlying offence was not serious
• Involved through coercion, intimidation or exploitation or as a result of domestic abuse
• Offender’s responsibility substantially reduced by mental disorder or learning disability

And then the harm at Category 3:

• Limited distress caused to an innocent party
• Limited impact on the administration of justice
• Limited delay caused to the course of justice

That would lead to:
Category range
High level community order – 9 months custody

If they fell under section 120 of the coroners and justice act 2009 and section 59(1) of the sentencing code

Click to expand...

I'm snail not a slug said:

Same, I worked until 4 years ago when I spent 5 months in icu (coma, dialysis, intubated, tracheostomy etc etc) no way can I work..some days I can barely look after myself!

Click to expand...

ＤＩＬＬＩＧＡＦ said:

I'm ignorant as do, and as equally dense, but if the evidence has been sent prior to the security breach then why is it tainted/tampered? If the digital records show the IP address the evidence was sent from/login session is correct and the victim verifies that the evidence is whole/unaltered from when they sent it, then why can it not be considered with full disclosure of the later breach?

I'd be surprised if that even makes sense.

Click to expand...

Anonymous said:

I think with evidence is despite it being sent prior, its still considered new evidence as its not been previously looked at from other investigations, the second part hurts my dyslexia slightly i know once an investigation is open and all evidence is seized the only people allowed to access it is the case officers, the victims themselves are not allowed as anything can be altered or changed, even the slightest thing can change the whole case.

Click to expand...

2 Pumps and a Chinese 🌸 said:

Did you just do a copypasta? it’s been such a long time since I’ve seen another person do this it’s perfect

Click to expand...

2 Pumps and a Chinese 🌸 said:

Angie claiming the clip is edited when she says she probably was the perp, that’s not even the first time she’s done it. She did it a few weeks back when accusing chippie of being the perp in his DV relationship just because she fell out with him. She’s so dangerous. Denying things that are there to see, it’s such a narc tactic

Click to expand...