Delusive angie @delusive_angie10

Big Gob

Member
Apr 2, 2024
4,344
12,913
113
Big gob Village
I’m just catching up but she was.

He was 16 and she was 17 so it wouldn’t be a statutory a charge. It would be whatever the standard a charge is so nothing to do with ages.

So she’s trying to make out it was to do with going police about their ages but she was older than him?
Yes I know now,I commented after I made the comment. Pearl said she was 15
 

Big Gob

Member
Apr 2, 2024
4,344
12,913
113
Big gob Village
I can’t watch Remi with all the voice texts going off constantly
Angry Chicken GIF by happydog
 

Medusa

Member
I'm trying not to say much about the Pearl and Zac situation because I believe you should never be judged for what a member of your family has done.

Are the things her family done twisted and evil? absolutely, and there's no excuse for it, a is a no matter how you look at it or how you try to minimise it, (in my eyes rapists should be handed over to their victim's families) but whatever her family member has done, is down to that individual and you can't hold her responsible for a horrendous and sick thing just because she has the same blood running through her veins.

That's just my take on it, she's still a gobby, racist, homophobic t and she always will be.

Zac's sly and he'll manipulate things to work in his favour, he'll poke away until he can get the reaction he wants, normally until someone snaps and then he'll play the victim or label them as the aggressor.

They're all fs!!
 
Nov 10, 2023
5,250
35,715
113
Florida
Yes I know now,I commented after I made the comment. Pearl said she was 15

Omg so pearl is lying so that she can pass it off as a statutory grape charge between a 16 year old boy and a 15 year old girl. But in fact both were over the age of consent so if he pled guilty, he pled guilty to actual a. Because statutory a can’t exist if both parties are over the age of consent?

So why is she lying?
 
Nov 10, 2023
5,250
35,715
113
Florida
I'm trying not to say much about the Pearl and Zac situation because I believe you should never be judged for what a member of your family has done.

Are the things her family done twisted and evil? absolutely, and there's no excuse for it, a is a no matter how you look at it or how you try to minimise it, (in my eyes rapists should be handed over to their victim's families) but whatever her family member has done, is down to that individual and you can't hold her responsible for a horrendous and sick thing just because she has the same blood running through her veins.

That's just my take on it, she's still a gobby, racist, homophobic t and she always will be.

Zac's sly and he'll manipulate things to work in his favour, he'll poke away until he can get the reaction he wants, normally until someone snaps and then he'll play the victim or label them as the aggressor.

They're all fs!!

I agree that we can’t hold people responsible for their families actions, but I’m holding her responsible for her actions which is diminishing what happened, being a a apologist and lying about the factors of the case to try and make her relative look better. If she would have just shut up then people wouldn’t really have anything to come for her over, but now she’s shown how she feels about victims of a so she can be accountable for that in my eyes. Dirty racist cow.
 
May 16, 2024
8,522
41,554
113
fopia
Omg so pearl is lying so that she can pass it off as a statutory grape charge between a 16 year old boy and a 15 year old girl. But in fact both were over the age of consent so if he pled guilty, he pled guilty to actual a. Because statutory a can’t exist if both parties are over the age of consent?

So why is she lying?
Pearl is lying through her back teeth. 🤬
 
Oct 29, 2023
7,726
41,805
113
San Francisco
www.tiktok.com
So if I was to make excuses for CLA's racist/transphobic rant it would be ok as it wasn't aimed at me personally?
Why you shoving words in my mouth 😭 please don’t read between the lines, I say what I mean without hidden meaning luv. Pretty low blow to be honest.

It would absolutely NOT be ok, I was merely pointing out the comparison was different because he was a direct victim in one and not the other. All LGBTQIA+ are victims in any discrimination, but not directly (1 on 1) so if that makes sense.