is just nanna crying over angie get out and touch grass immediately nanna
I like them and leave them alone, but they piss me off when they start getting dumb. Wish they'd just stick to staying under the fruit trees, getting pissed until the frost comes rather than terrorising me.
As I say, without them showing the @ there's no way to know. & now so much time has passed it's fing stupid. The only way I'd accept the @ proof would be if there was a screen-recording of that live showing the comment & immediately showing the @. & I'm still not sure why it fing matters.Interesting, because when I searched for red red wine accounts earlier this wasn't even on my search list.And the name isn't the same so doubtful.
My heads mashed, because that account definitely wasn't anywhere to be found earlier, I searched for other red red wine accounts, I even flipped from burner to burner and on my main account and I found nothing. There were red red wine accounts but not with that pfp or name. So right now I'm so confused.
Following:
Followers:
So, obviously the nickname is not the same as shown in the screenshot but the profile picture is. If, and I repeat if, this is the account, then it's obviously a burner. They don't follow anyone from CC, even. Once again, without the @ from the actual comment left it's impossible to 100% say which account left it.
One way to potentially give a small amount of defense would be to find RedRedWine's known accounts commenting around that time to compare profile pictures and nickname layout, but it's all a bit OTT to me. The comment seems to be something they're desperately grasping onto, rather than being of any actual significance. I could say I created any account, but without proof that I have the ability to log in to said account it's just hearsay/bullshit. There's more focus on that comment than the comments or account they're saying RedRedWine was trolling on. "Awfully odd."
And now Mushroom is on, pretending he'd drive around punching people's heads in.
If the likes of noncey Brigham, or anybody for that matter, was accusing me of mocking csa, I'd do everything necessary to prove the fs wrongAs I say, without them showing the @ there's no way to know. & now so much time has passed it's fing stupid. The only way I'd accept the @ proof would be if there was a screen-recording of that live showing the comment & immediately showing the @. & I'm still not sure why it fing matters.
Iv said the same. I'm just giving points of what Iv noticed and why that comment would even be allowed and how rare it would be of squeak and co not to notice a fake account. Something doesn't add upAs I say, without them showing the @ there's no way to know. & now so much time has passed it's fing stupid. The only way I'd accept the @ proof would be if there was a screen-recording of that live showing the comment & immediately showing the @. & I'm still not sure why it fing matters.
She's embarrassing, at times i think she's worse than Hayley for rimming Angie.Just nanna really rimming Angie who let’s face it doesn’t give 2 ss
I was in the that live, comments were moving quite quick, I don't remember them mentioning that comment, most of the time they don't read the comments.Then I'd still be interested to know how it managed to slide into lives that are 99% of the time hosted like a private call and harder to get into than North Korea. I think redredwine needs to be questioning the people in the box about that
Also if they are so against the fact they never mentioned Kelly's uncle, never mocked her abuse etc they wouldn't find that comment funny and I'd imagine they'd highlight it as not funny, or out of character for red red wine. Either way I don't believe it just flew under the radar and nobody noticed it.
I agree. It's all a bit strange and confusing.Iv said the same. I'm just giving points of what Iv noticed and why that comment would even be allowed and how rare it would be of squeak and co not to notice a fake account. Something doesn't add up