I hate Tam but Sarah is VILE. She’s also being used imo by members of the discord, to do things to others so that the others hands are clean and she takes the hit for it. She’s a doxxer, she’s weird and acts nutty to impress others, shes rang social services on people.
I think Troy has just been on and said that Tink won't be joining Angie as she's worried about the most recent victim she's in contact with.Please can someone message Tinks and advice her about going on Angies live. I feel sick that this lady is going to go on her live
is this 'fight night at the harvester' a regular occurrence now?
) have called people simpletons (when though??) in your forum! Call people fat rhinos (weird behaviour sticking up for Tam...) but if anybody else had called someone fat you would be making one of your stupid videos. (Stan alert!) Get a life (mdr, we have no lives, we are lifeless everyone ) get a job (ooh, burn) because yous are probably all fat (womp womp womp) lazy (
) dole bums. (oh, yeah, say bum again 
) Get a life instead of tiktok. (but you watch us ) If yous have kids yous want to be ashamed. (bOnK bOnK) Nothing but bullies. (oh, the paaaaainnn ) Blah Blah Blah Blah Blah. BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH."
I’m not replying either! I think if people don’t want calling out they shouldn’t be fs end of!
Did you just do a copypasta?"who do you think you are...(Jar of hearts type beat)...I've been looking on CC (oooh a fan) and you all are vile bullies. Call out dg but yous (yous?
it’s been such a long time since I’ve seen another person do this it’s perfect
Same, I worked until 4 years ago when I spent 5 months in icu (coma, dialysis, intubated, tracheostomy etc etc) no way can I work..some days I can barely look after myself!
Anyone else had a delightful message
THANK YOU !We are discussing @tinkerbellk who has accused @Cockney_Ben of being abusive.
This is not the same Tinks with dark hair, does OF and has association with Alex Brigham, Irish Kelly, Chloeetc.
You best not have swallowed Grandads dictionary
I'm ignorant as do, and as equally dense, but if the evidence has been sent prior to the security breach then why is it tainted/tampered? If the digital records show the IP address the evidence was sent from/login session is correct and the victim verifies that the evidence is whole/unaltered from when they sent it, then why can it not be considered with full disclosure of the later breach?
Thing is, a large percentage of people that watch TikTok all day, are people that cannot work due to health reasons. We aren’t just living off benefits having the time of our lives. Being chronically unwell or disabled, it’s not a lifestyle choice.
I think with evidence is despite it being sent prior, its still considered new evidence as its not been previously looked at from other investigations, the second part hurts my dyslexia slightlyI'm ignorant as do, and as equally dense, but if the evidence has been sent prior to the security breach then why is it tainted/tampered? If the digital records show the IP address the evidence was sent from/login session is correct and the victim verifies that the evidence is whole/unaltered from when they sent it, then why can it not be considered with full disclosure of the later breach?
I'd be surprised if that even makes sense.
i know once an investigation is open and all evidence is seized the only people allowed to access it is the case officers, the victims themselves are not allowed as anything can be altered or changed, even the slightest thing can change the whole case.
