i have a bad experience with my ex best friend if she was doing something i had experience with i’d have a bit of empathy just proves your a heartless b
jodie-leigh @deadringxr
- Thread starter Deleted member 2623
- Start date
The legal papers do not say that though.
Inconclusive
not leading to a firm conclusion or result; not ending doubt or dispute.
A lot of the conditions were questioned but concluded with the same result, not to be found.
It is hard to believe you when this is black and white law order.
I don't know how we are supposedly nitpicking and selective reading when it is 47 documentation pages over a 2 year period? I am no professor in English but i know from my studies that selective reading etc is only taking a small piece of information and disregarding the rest. That is 47 pages we have all read and have all agreed the same outcome? If any of us were nitpicking we would call it out to them. We go based on evidence...
I wouldn’t really say it’s nit picking when you you claim to have conditions that you don’t have a emphasised with people about it. I’d say that’s quick serious?.
Not how it works. I initially thought that myself and it wasn’t allowed to be brought up to the tribunal. They’re allowed to attempt to settle out of tribunal, they came back with 3 offers over the time and I turned them all down.
Yup. Like I said I have been going through things but I’m actively struggling atm but still sat here trying to talk to you all.
I’ve shared personal things on here that I did not have to but there’s stuff on paperwork I absolutely do not want on here to do with trauma. I’m already getting things thrown at my face. There is telephone and teams appointments that I don’t have things on paper for. I said initially you are going to have to bear with me.
I don’t mind for peoples opinions of me with my personality, if you think I trauma dump etc. but out right twisting things and lying about my health just isn’t okay and that’s why I came to actually discuss things and share things with you to help those concerns.
Oh yeah we’ve had personal run ins. Probably bout a year or close to a year now?
That’s your view and I’m not gonna argue with it
tbf I did actually say that night for the first time ever I’m actually concerned and feel for her when others didn’t. I didn’t argue with them for thinking different at that time.
You’re going on a case where I was bullied.
They denied knowing about my health and I didn’t even have a lawyer I represented myself
You don’t have access to my statement, my witness statements and all the things in between. You’re basing my health on this?
Question is did you read your own Tribunal and papers because you are being very selective.
All the people in that live (if you mean where angie was cutting her hair), expressed concern so there was no difference on opinion on that live.That’s your view and I’m not gonna argue with it
Basing it also on the things you sent in which we still haven’t seen anything on other conditions you have claimed to have. And only seen referrals so far. No outcomes
And the document states throughout LACK OF EVIDENCE of your HEALTH, we're basing it on that and the lack of "evidence" in general.
Have YOU read the tribunal??
States here that the bullying was a two way system and that it appears you just had a personal vindictive against said person stated? If it was anyone else the outcome would be different
Attachments
CHARGE YOUR PHONE...jk sorry had toBTW yes my phone needs charging... don't come for me everyone
Sorry took some hefty scrolling through my email archiveNot how court works
But it’s absolutely how UK employment tribunal works. It is not the same. Hope this helps.
Attachments
It says albeit they did not think the claimant (me) was apart of it but of other witness statements they believe it was personal amongst them.
All I’m asking is that people consider the fact there is a lot of evidence from both parties that are not public. What I went through is not something im comfortable speaking about.
Understood. Just be aware “evidence” you’ve shown for illness dont prove anything even tho you dont have to do that
People are gona be hurt when they have conditions and you are claiming to have them as well but everything is stating otherwise
Also ACAS emails is just an advice service prior to court that will try get a settlement between you and your job
I just dont get where BPD comes into any of this even though you have spoke about this on live many times
That wasnt what i meant with thats not how court works.
That is an offer by a lawyer to consilidate the case that you would have had to have spoken to acas about at the start of pursuing it, it is from the claimant (you in this case) that this would have come from not the employer.